Cases

Case studies

20 cases across markets, engineering and commercial decisions. Choose a challenge, work the numbers, then defend your recommendation.

13 of 20
Teaching scenarioADDED OCT 2026

A factory shifts load, then catches up

A factory can reduce load during a high-price hour, but production must be recovered later. Its commercial team wants to count both an energy saving and a programme payment.

Permanent case link

Your task

Calculate net event value, challenge baseline sensitivity and identify what stops a physical reduction automatically becoming an eligible payment.

PrepareEvent-and-rebound ledger + baseline sensitivity + eligibility checklist
Your role

Demand-flexibility analyst checking a customer proposal

Practice data & worked solution
PRACTICE DATASET

Measure the whole response window

Download CSV

Original synthetic two-hour exercise. Both rows last one hour. Customer energy purchases use the shown spot prices. A separate hypothetical contract pays A$200 per verified event MWh reduced in hour one only; assume it permits payment alongside these energy savings. Lost production/recovery cost is A$400. No baseline approval, wholesale eligibility, network saving or real WDRM settlement is implied.

Teaching inputs · synthetic data
HourBaseline MWActual MWSpot AUD per MWh
11061000
21012100

Your analysis

  1. Calculate event reduction, rebound energy and baseline versus actual energy purchase costs.
  2. Add the assumed incentive and production cost. Explain why gross curtailed MWh alone is not the net energy saving.
  3. Change the first-hour baseline from 10 MW to 8 MW. Recalculate net value and explain the evidence required to select a valid baseline.
Worked solution

Event and rebound

The event reduction is 4 MWh. The second hour adds 2 MWh above baseline, so net energy reduction is 2 MWh. Baseline energy cost is A$11,000; actual cost is A$7,200. Energy-cost saving is A$3,800, including the A$200 rebound cost.

Contract contribution

The assumed payment is 4 × 200 = A$800. Net contribution is 3,800 + 800 − 400 = A$4,200. This depends on the invented contract explicitly allowing both benefits. A real offer requires its actual settlement and benefit-allocation terms; copying this arithmetic into WDRM could double-count value.

Baseline sensitivity

With an 8 MW first-hour baseline, event reduction is 2 MWh and baseline energy cost is A$9,000. Energy-cost saving becomes A$1,800, incentive A$400 and net contribution A$1,800. Total baseline and actual energy are both 18 MWh. Validate the baseline method, operating schedule, telemetry and eligibility rather than choosing the most profitable counterfactual.

Review your response
  • Window: include rebound rather than reporting only the event hour.
  • Counterfactual: baseline choice and uncertainty are visible.
  • Settlement: invented payments are not presented as official WDRM entitlements.
  • Decision: contract compatibility, operational limits and production recovery are explicit.

This checklist supports self-review. No tutor marking or independent credential is included.

Related topics 4
Sources & evidence

All figures are original teaching inputs, not observations or published forecasts. The official source supplies industry context, not this dataset. Source link checked 17 October 2026. Consult AEMO's WDRM material for registration, baseline and settlement requirements; the simplified contract here is not WDRM settlement.

AEMO Wholesale demand response mechanism

Take the next step: applied projects

Assess a data-centre energy planConnect demand, grid capacity, procurement and backup power.Write an industry briefCheck industry data and turn your evidence into a recommendation.